Post updated on 28/04/2010
Post completely rewritten
Durante i suoi travasi di bile, scrive :
Post completely rewritten
Lately Straker is having diversi travasi di bile...... Infatti è stato abbondantemente sputtanato in diretta nazionale con Report.....eh eh eh.
Il 18 aprile, Milena Gabanelli ha letto in trasmissione una delle deliranti e paranoiche lettere arrivate in redazione, dopo le GoodNews di qualche settimana fa sull'attività del CICAP, a seguito di una campagna denigratoria dei "soliti noti".
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Durante i suoi travasi di bile, scrive :
Ora, a prescindere dal fatto che Airlines.net è un sito acquisito da tempo (il suo creatore è morto in circostanze poco chiare circa un anno fa) e che quindi può pubblicare qualsiasi foto a favore della bislacca tesi delle contrails , è palese che quanto ritratto in questa foto è il fumo prodotto dalla combustione, tanto è vero che è visibilmente azzurro! O vorrebbero che noi credessimo che la condensa assume tale colorazione? Inoltre i dati exif della foto pubblicata sul sito sopra citato, evidenziano che il file immagine è stato modificato e da esso sono stati rimossi tutti i riferimenti alla macchina fotografica con la quale è the snapshot was taken. The suspects are therefore lawful.
careless readers (clearly not a frequenter of this blog) may also be considered a "conspiracy" plausible, but knowing who wrote a famous "pundits computer, you should always stay on ' careful ...
In fact, for a change is sbufala alone eh eh eh.
So the offending picture is as follows:
Apart from the obvious that is not original to the one taken, have included the writing and the writing under Airliners.net overlay. But look carefully at the data " exif indicted "
As you can see the image has been processed by the program prepared NeatImage (a software for removing noise, is used in the pictures with fast moving subjects).
for most of this does not say anything, but it's good to know that this program, the freely downloadable demo version and does not allow the full exif data retention ....... and here is revealed the mystery (as stated Tech or OneGeek ):
To support this also shows the comment of a photo technician :
statement reported by Straker
Contrails can not be formed at a height of land
The topic was discussed , but probably there are those who prefer to stay in their blissful ignorance (repetita iuvant ).
As a flagship publication of the NASA reads:
But let's see what he says really PHYSICS ..........
Se l'umidità relativa è al 100% non significa che c'è solo acqua, ma che quella massa d'aria contiene la massima quantità di umidità contenibile in quelle condizioni. Quando l'umidità relativa dell'aria raggiunge il 100%, l'eccesso di vapor acqueo condensa in minuscole goccioline d'acqua e si assiste alla formazione di una nube. La quantità di vapore che può essere contenuta da una massa d'aria è fortemente influenzato dalla temperatura, infatti diminuisce al diminuire della temperatura (pensate quando si "alita" in inverno), and pressure level ground, it becomes nothing to -40 ° C.
The colors and shadows of the picture would not be consistent
For this statement in the opinion of a true photographic technique, Skura :
Straker In this case demonstrates its ignorance of what is called "architecture Rural ", which among other features the cover (roof) pitched asymmetrical. Here are some Italian examples:
Rural Architecture in "asymmetric slopes is characteristic of areas Climb and cold climates, but often finds himself in plain specialmodo in barns, as it allows:
But then ......
........................ what can we expect from someone who has forged a degree in Architecture .
And then, finally, the enemy tank has made another small figure ....... (I'll leave you to imagine what).
This person should have the decency to learn a little bit better, and more than anything to prevent him to speak in unknown fields such as physics of water vapor and the photograph instead of the false claim and get caught by paranoid delusions.
for most of this does not say anything, but it's good to know that this program, the freely downloadable demo version and does not allow the full exif data retention ....... and here is revealed the mystery (as stated Tech or OneGeek ):
To support this also shows the comment of a photo technician :
[snip] I can confirm that the 'image has been processed with NeatImage (Note: process, not "doctored"). The program uses a series of algorithms to balance the photo neii contrasts, and make it look like "more defined" in the same contrast, the "shortened" the color space between two adjacent tones (the border area between two or more colors, in plain English) to give l 'impression that the picture is more defined and contrasted. Besides this, the photo was processed tones and rebalanced on highlights of them to prevent "shoot" on the white (effect Madonna on the phone, for instance). We certify that the clone tool was not used to the exclusion of part of the picture occupied by the sky (probably to optimize the background and make it more balanced picture as a whole). [Snip]Not content with producing a video paranoid (as usual) on the subject, he states:
- again what is written above
- that contrails can not form a ground share
- colors and shadows are not consistent
- there are structures that in his view are "cut".
statement reported by Straker
Contrails can not be formed at a height of land
The topic was discussed , but probably there are those who prefer to stay in their blissful ignorance (repetita iuvant ).
As a flagship publication of the NASA reads:
"Contrails only form at very high altitudes (usually above 8 km) Where the air is Extremely cold (less than -40 degrees C).
Translation: "Contrails only form at very high altitudes (usually more than 8 km), where the air is extremely cold (below -40 ° C)."according to him, it is possible that the contrails are formed at a height of land, and then accuses us dirty debunkers to change the laws of physics as we like ......
But let's see what he says really PHYSICS ..........
The relative humidity (measured in percentage) is the ratio between the amount of water vapor contained in an air mass and the maximum amount of water vapor that the same air mass can contain the same conditions temperature and pressure (saturation).
where e = air vapor pressure (hPa) T = air temperature (°C) e "UR" = umidità relativa dell'aria
Se l'umidità relativa è al 100% non significa che c'è solo acqua, ma che quella massa d'aria contiene la massima quantità di umidità contenibile in quelle condizioni. Quando l'umidità relativa dell'aria raggiunge il 100%, l'eccesso di vapor acqueo condensa in minuscole goccioline d'acqua e si assiste alla formazione di una nube. La quantità di vapore che può essere contenuta da una massa d'aria è fortemente influenzato dalla temperatura, infatti diminuisce al diminuire della temperatura (pensate quando si "alita" in inverno), and pressure level ground, it becomes nothing to -40 ° C.
So if the temperature is low enough moisture in the exhaust of the engine (combustion of hydrocarbons) is sufficient to produce a contrail also share the ground (as can be see in the picture above airliner and a video filmed by students in Fairbanks Alaska at -45 ° C and present in Blog Ann @ ).
-----------
-----------
The colors and shadows of the picture would not be consistent
For this statement in the opinion of a true photographic technique, Skura :
[snip] .. Blue Shadows mystery, eh? The shades of blue photos are only a factor of 'exposure' s effect is easily duplicated during shooting any photographing a mountain village in the same light conditions (winter afternoon, on the edge of the night, allegedly by the average angle of the shadows thrown on the roof, about 16-17 hours, so many accidents).
's more d' "inconsistencies" on the shadows, there is no trace, some houses are already in the twilight some will not, and have slightly different angles of each other, it is normal to have shadows of different houses in different form each other, as might be out of the shadows of different colors of homes illuminated with different incidence [snip]
And even in this case the problem does not arise
Some of the houses in the photo are "cut".
The pundits in his statement refers to this:
Straker In this case demonstrates its ignorance of what is called "architecture Rural ", which among other features the cover (roof) pitched asymmetrical. Here are some Italian examples:
Rural Architecture in "asymmetric slopes is characteristic of areas Climb and cold climates, but often finds himself in plain specialmodo in barns, as it allows:
- more radiation and ventilation of animal feed (which is dry and does not become waterlogged
- a faster melting of snow on the ground short of the roof, which allows more radiation combined with a faster heating of the outer wall where it was located typically in the kitchen (once the hottest part of the house, place where he met the whole family).
But then ......
........................ what can we expect from someone who has forged a degree in Architecture .
And then, finally, the enemy tank has made another small figure ....... (I'll leave you to imagine what).
This person should have the decency to learn a little bit better, and more than anything to prevent him to speak in unknown fields such as physics of water vapor and the photograph instead of the false claim and get caught by paranoid delusions.
I leave with my first video on Straker ...... If you know it you avoid
__________________________________
__________________________________
not bite the buffaloes and the rogue network, inquire before you believe.
PS
Following the allegations made in the video of Straker, I want to clarify that I do not know neither Miles nor Gabanelli Attivissimo Paul (although I would be honored to know them, these links are only in the mind of Straker buggy).
Then even a child would understand this:
is not a fake ID in the sense ....... not really an identity card, is a composite image material taken from the network, as signature here.
Not to doubt the frequenters of this blog, but remember this for a who regularly makes fun of its readers .
Greetings
Fioba
Ma quale sarà la "clamorosa" ammissione del quirinale..... Let's see:
But carefully analyze them (my comments in bold)
___________________________________________________
Insomma a me questa me pare na' strunzata!!! Un'altra classica bufala paranoica di Straker.
Rosariuccio, ti do un consiglio spassionato (era un detto del mio vecchio prof. di matematica e fisica al liceo ma che ti si adatta perfettamente), seguilo:
Fioba
Following the allegations made in the video of Straker, I want to clarify that I do not know neither Miles nor Gabanelli Attivissimo Paul (although I would be honored to know them, these links are only in the mind of Straker buggy).
Then even a child would understand this:
is not a fake ID in the sense ....... not really an identity card, is a composite image material taken from the network, as signature here.
Not to doubt the frequenters of this blog, but remember this for a who regularly makes fun of its readers .
Greetings
Fioba
Update
In his paranoid boring S traker pulls even in the midst of the Head of State trumpeting: Quirinale admits the existence of the "chemtrails"
A representative of the Quirinale responded to our friend and colleague who had asked, in a documented and incisive instance, the President of the Republic, Giorgio Napolitano. The answer, though laconic, Pilate and specious, è de facto un'ammissione che è in atto una gigantesca operazione di natura strategico-militare . L'assistente militare per l'Aeronautica, infatti, non nega che il problema sussiste, bensì cita non meglio precisate "disposizioni di legge" (veniamo avvelenati in ottemperanza alla normativa vigente), demandando (non a caso) al Ministero della Difesa (!) una replica più esauriente. Nella risposta quindi non si tenta neppure di confutare o ridimensionare la circostanziata denuncia della scrivente sulle scie chimiche: siamo al cospetto di un riconoscimento ufficiale , né più né meno.
Ma quale sarà la "clamorosa" ammissione del quirinale..... Let's see:
But carefully analyze them (my comments in bold)
___________________________________________________
Dear Ms. ***, I meanWhat I play: Nooooo ..... with another is' hoax trails comic (but I can tell you ......)
to your letter of March 31, 2010, subject arrive at the head of state. On the merits of the proposed action, while understanding the motivations and the moral and emotional involvement which resulted in its application,
I inform you that despite my can not intervene in matters governed by specific laws , the implementation of which falls to the competent ministries and the Presidency of the Republic may not intervene in any way.
Which means: Whatever you ask, the Presidency of the Republic may not intervene as it is not competent. In particular matter, covering the aviation industry, is the responsibility of the Ministry of Defence as per provisions of law (as indeed is the Minister of Defence responded to parliamentary questions). Luckily, you have a brother who teaches Italian.
As introduced above, we inform you that your application was again brought to the attention of the competent Ministry of Defence , comprehensive direct response to a solicitation.
regret not being provided the best answer, I send you my best regards.
military assistance for the Air Force
Signature illegible
Firma illeggibile....... miiiii quanto sei polemico. Se vai sul sito del Quirinale trovi tutti i nomi, solo che non hai le palle per pubblicarli.
_____________________________________________ Insomma a me questa me pare na' strunzata!!! Un'altra classica bufala paranoica di Straker.
Rosariuccio, ti do un consiglio spassionato (era un detto del mio vecchio prof. di matematica e fisica al liceo ma che ti si adatta perfettamente), seguilo:
"Prima penza poi sccrivi. La sccrittura è la notazione di un penziero. Se uno prima 'un penza, che cacchio sccrive?" Greetings
(G. Pisani)
Fioba
